How to create an uninviting and unloved public space
February 11, 2013 § 7 Comments
“It is difficult to design a space that will not attract people. What is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.” – William Whyte
There are a handful of exciting public space projects on the horizon in North Oak Cliff that will soon dot a stretch of Seventh street, creating an inviting pedestrian/bicycle experience that connects neighborhoods to destination points along the corridor with three planned plazas. A Bishop Arts Gateway that will act as the soon to arrive streetcar stop on the East side, Rosemont Plaza which will act as a resident oriented plaza on the West side, and a centralized public square in the center at Tyler street that addresses an extremely dangerous 5-point intersection. This corridor was the former streetcar line which ran parallel to Davis street and created a natural pathway from the neighborhoods to the commercial corridors along Seventh street.
So how do you create an inviting and engaging public space that requires little maintenance and administration? Let’s first cite an example of a poorly designed public space to see what not to do:
Bishop Arts Pocket Park
I’m referencing this project because it’s often cited by an area property owner as to why public space projects are failures. Also, the owner cites the “private space” as being a better steward of the land, though one could simply drive up and down Davis Street in North Oak Cliff and point out endless private edge failures. On closer inspection, it’s fairly simple to see why the Bishop Arts pocket park is unused. First off, let’s address the basics:
Size: Approx. 40′x40′
North side: Davis and Bishop Street t-intersection
South side: Parking lot
East side: Parking lot
West side: Non-active edge of building
Amenities: Concrete semi-circle bench, abstract art, trash can, 1 park bench facing South parking lot.
When creating public space, there are a handful of focus points that must be addressed to help create an active area which include:
2. Shared Access
3. Stay Power (8-80 Rule)
Here’s a break down of the grade for each:
Safety grade: F
Right off the bat, you’ll notice the pocket park faces Bishop and Davis Streets. If you are a parent with small children does this edge look or feel safe as a place to linger? At night, car lights will be facing you, and no separation (outside of the curb) prevents a vehicle which is t-boned at this intersection from encroaching onto the public space. Paris is known as the “City of Bollards”, it also provides some of the most engaging outdoor spaces in the world, as well as some of the most simple. These inexpensive and well placed bollards provide a simple separation between vehicles and pedestrians that immediately elevate the streets perception of safety:
Four small concrete bollards do exist in the pocket park but break up the space at the half way point (near the 20′ mark) as opposed to lining the curb making more usable space. Other elements to note are that the eastern edge has no shade which makes the park basically uninviting during half of the year from 8AM to 4PM. If the goal is to have people sit outside, we must at least provide protection from the sun. Ironically, trees do line the South edge, which give little to no shade for the concrete bench and actually obscure the view to the District itself. At night, there is no pedestrian oriented lighting, making the space feel uninviting and potentially dangerous.
Shared Use Grade: D
This area was obviously planned for pedestrians, has little invitation for other modes of transit (bicycles, public transit), and offers no real gateway connection to the District unless an individual plans on walking along Bishop and entering a parking lot before arriving at the destination. We also want to look at the potential for businesses along the edge to easily gain access to the public space and benefit from its presence (thus providing an incentive to maintain). In this instance, a small concrete semi-circle bench/buffer cuts off much of the usable space available for the building to the West, while the small food stand to the South and East is also blocked off.
One thing to note: A single bike rack would help create an inviting presence for cyclists into the district and show-off the area as a bike friendly block to people driving along Davis.
Stay Power: D
Lastly, we want the space to encourage people to linger and invite friends out to use. We’ve already addressed the lack of shade, but beyond that the only compelling reason to visit this pocket park is the abstract sculpture. You have to ask a couple of questions when encouraging stay power: Who are you attempting to invite? Is the space inviting to 8/80 year olds (if you focus on these bookends, everyone else will feel welcome)? What is there to do once you arrive? And, what compels you to return? Now, from the start, I’m not a huge fan of using abstract art in gateways. It requires interpretation which children will immediately disregard, and is better appreciated on art museum grounds or design districts (places that focus on adult art appreciation).
Notice the non-interpretive Alice in Wonderland statue in Central Park, New York. Children love it, it creates an inviting presence, and it ends up being a destination for families. It accomplishes art, invitation, and destination in one fell swoop. It’s also surrounded by shade and benches. In the Bishop Arts pocket park, once you’ve seen the statue, nothing compels you to return. There’s nothing new to read, no information on what exists in the District, and no amenities (outside of a concrete bench). If the audience for the existing statue is more for passers-by, then place it in a traffic circle in the middle of Seventh and Bishop. That way, it’s got greater visibility, helps slow traffic, and isn’t something something someone needs to walk directly in front of.
One of the most common uses for public spaces is a place to eat or read. Something immediately lacking in the Bishop Arts pocket park are tables. There’s no where to set your plate, newspaper, or game board. Again, it’s not difficult to create a public space that people will use, we just seem to create them all of the time. I think that much of the reason is due to the fact that we focus on making these areas engaging to auto users who are passing by the area, and not truly adapting the space for pedestrian comfort and function.
Now let’s look at another plaza in a similarly sized space that addresses people in a smarter way:
The above is a portion of Silver Plaza in Silver Spring, Maryland. A couple of simple things to note are the amount of shade trees throughout the space and an umbrella to the right. Also, you’ll note bollards along the curb (enhanced safety), lighting, movable seating and tables (stay power) and a business that can engage and manage the space properly (shared access). If the planters are too administrative, fill them with rocks and drought tolerant plants. What you don’t see is a small water feature which is directly to the left of this image that invites children to play. You don’t even have to be as elaborate as a spray chute…simply place a boulder that pools water and allows a place for people to water their dogs when they walk by:
The key to creating well loved and inviting public spaces is to think about the end-user and what you want to accomplish in the space. It’s really not that difficult, imagine it’s your backyard. How would you address guests? Now extrapolate that example to public spaces. How would you make a public gathering place? How could it enhance surrounding businesses? How could it invite families? Pet owners? Grandparents? How would you make it feel safe from cars? at night? How would you encourage bicycling to and through the space? What amenities would invite people to sit and eat? How would you protect users from direct sunlight? How would you invite the public to setup weekend activities like markets? outdoor music? dancing? What partners in the area would be most compelled to assist with ownership (HOA’s, non-profits, private businesses)? How would you keep maintenance and administration costs to a minimum?
So what are some easy fixes for the Bishop Arts pocket park? You could place something as simple as four large empty planters along the North edge, a community bulletin board in the center, a teeter totter under the south shade trees, plant a single shade tree directly to the side and East of the sculpture, re-orient existing park bench to face the teeter-totter, 1 bike rack, 1 pedestrian light, 1 trash can (existing), and movable tables and chairs (the assumption often made is that these will get stolen…what has been shown in reality is that this very rarely happens). Ideally you’d eventually remove the concrete sitting wall to open the space up and engage the buildings directly beside the park. Later you could add a water fountain for dogs. Create the feeling of a safe and inviting enclosure that has stronger visible connections to the district.
To make things even simpler, if you are beginning a public space project, start with these four elements: Paint, bollards (can be planters), tables/chairs, and shade (trees or umbrellas):
From there, increment change and test ideas to see what works and what doesn’t work. Find a way to allow food into the area (either via food trucks or existing area restaurants). Keep adapting the space as it will always need to change with the times. Remember, a great city can be measured by the number and quality of its public spaces.